Eu comecei por tropeçar num artigo de 2009, Effects of elevated CO2 on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Physiological and yield attributes. Nele, Moutinho et al. descrevem como se comportam as videiras num ambiente normal, e noutro enriquecido com níveis de CO2 de 550ppm. As experiências decorreram entre 2004 e 2006, sendo que os resultados são particularmente conclusivos (todos os realces da minha responsabilidade):
The elevated [CO2] concentration increased net photosynthetic rate (A), intrinsic water use efficiency (A/gs), leaf thickness, Mg concentration, C/N, K/N and Mg/N ratios and decreased stomatal density and N concentration. Nevertheless, stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), leaf water potential, SPAD-values and Red/Far-red ratio transmitted by leaves were not significantly affected by [CO2]. Meanwhile, there is no evidence for downward acclimation of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. Yield, cluster weight and vigour showed an increase in elevated [CO2] treatment but yield to pruning mass ratio was unaffected. |
Depois de descobrir esta pérola, descobri outro artigo, este mais apropriado para enólogos. Intitulado "Effects of Elevated CO2 on Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Volatile Composition, Phenolic Content, and in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Red Wine", enumera uma série de aspectos químicos, antes de dar a machadada final nos alarmistas:
This study showed that the predicted rise in [CO2] did not produce negative effects on the quality of grapes and red wine. Although some of the compounds were slightly affected, the red wine quality remained almost unaffected. |